Käytämme sivustollamme evästeitä kehittääksemme käyttökokemusta. Jatkamalla hyväksyt evästeiden käytön sivustollamme.
Jotkut evästeistä ovat tarpeellisia sivuston toiminnallisuuden varmistamiseen. Voit kuitenkin halutessasi estää kaikki evästeet selaimestasi. Käytämme analytiikka-evästeitä (esimerkiksi Google Analytics) ymmärtääksemme paremmin kuinka ihmiset käyttävät sivustoamme ja parantaaksemme käyttökokemusta. Käytämme markkinointi-evästeitä (esimerkiksi Facebook ja Google) parantaaksemme esitettävien mainosten laatua ja kohdennusta.
Uiguuri Merdan Ghapparista ei olla kuultu kuukausiin
Huonoista oloista kertoneesta uiguurista Merdan Ghapparista ei olla kuultu kuukausiin. Pelkäämme kidutusta.
Merdan Ghappar, 31, is a Uyghur fashion model for Taobao, one of the largest Chinese online retailers. He left Xinjiang in 2009 for better prospects in the eastern part of China. He was working in Foshan, Guangdong Province, when he was sentenced to 16 months’ imprisonment for selling cannabis. He resumed his model work after being released in late November 2019.
His videos and social media messages describing his detention conditions were reported by BBC on 4 August. The report went viral and attracted a lot of attention to the mass detentions and other human rights violations in Xinjiang. The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs initially refuted the BBC report and described it as “typical fake news”. Afterwards, the BBC received a written statement by the Xinjiang government press office disclosing more details.
According to China’s Criminal Procedure Law, “compulsory measures” comprise a range of measures with varying degrees of restriction or deprivation of personal liberty that may be taken by law enforcement or judicial authorities against a criminal suspect or defendant. These range from the more restrictive criminal detention or arrest, in which an individual is held in custody at a formal detention centre, to the less restrictive residential surveillance or release on bail pending further investigation. It also includes “residential surveillance in a designated location. In March 2020, the United Nations human rights expert bodies expressed their alarm at the ongoing use of residential surveillance at a designated location (RSDL) in China, a detention system that enables the authorities to hold criminal suspects for periods of up to six months outside the formal detention system in what can amount to a form of secret incommunicado detention. This form of detention has been used to curb the activities of human rights defenders, including lawyers, activists and religious practitioners.
Xinjiang is one of the most ethnically diverse regions in China. More than half of the region’s population of 22 million people belong to mostly Turkic and predominantly Muslim ethnic groups, including Uyghurs (around 11.3 million), Kazakhs (around 1.6 million) and other populations whose languages, cultures and ways of life vary distinctly from those of the Han who are the majority in “interior” China.
In March 2017, the Xinjiang government enacted the “De-extremification Regulation” that identifies and prohibits a wide range of behaviours labelled “extremist”, such as “spreading extremist thought”, denigrating or refusing to watch public radio and TV programmes, wearing burkas, having an “abnormal” beard, resisting national policies, and publishing, downloading, storing, or reading articles, publications, or audio-visual materials containing “extremist content”. The regulation also set up a “responsibility system” for government cadres for “anti-extremism” work and established annual reviews of their performance.
It is estimated that up to a million Uyghurs, Kazakhs and other predominantly Muslim people have been held in the “transformation-through-education” centres. The Chinese authorities had denied the existence of such facilities until October 2018, when they began describing them as voluntary, free “vocational training” centres. They claim that the objective of this vocational training is to provide people with technical and vocational education to enable them to find jobs and become “useful” citizens. China’s explanation, however, contradicts reports of beatings, food deprivation and solitary confinement that have been collected from former detainees.
China has rejected calls from the international community, including Amnesty International, to allow independent experts unrestricted access to Xinjiang. Instead, China has made efforts to silence criticism by inviting delegations from different countries to visit Xinjiang for carefully orchestrated and closely monitored tours.